|
Submitted by Brett Gledhill
Ancestors
- Pedigree Chart
Our records show that Nathaniel Eames was the fourth child and
second Nathaniel born to Rowland Eames (b.1682) and Jane Price at
Llanllyfni Wales. This name, Nathaniel, probably came as a result
of the great respect which Rowland (b.1682) had for his own father
and his desire that a son of his should live to maturity bearing
that name. We can only speculate from the records what affect this
special gift of a name had on the son Nathaniel (b.1715). In later
years, Nathaniel mould reciprocate in kind by naming his only son
in honor of his father Rowland. That son, Rowland (b.l756), mould
proudly name his first child Humphrey Jones, in honor of his father-in-law
Humphrey John, and his second son Rowland named Nathaniel (b.1789)
to honor his own father. This younger Nathaniel named his first
son Rowland, and his next 2 children were given the middle name
of Rowland. So, we see this tradition had among the Eames line was
a very special one, where the hearts of the Fathers were turned
to their sons, and the sons to their fathers.
The young boy Nathaniel Eames (b.1715) was about 12 years old
in 1727 when his grandfather Nathaniel (b.1650) passed away at Llanllyfni.
The grandson likely had known his grandfather well having been raised
all his life in the same city, Llanllyfni, where his grandfather
one year had been guardian. Nor was death of a loved one something
entirely unknown to the young boy of 12. He had lost his own mother,
Jane Price at the tender age of 5 years and then his stepmother,
Ellen Jones, when he was 10. Nathaniel was blessed to come from
a large family, however. Before he was 17 years old, Nathaniel had
6 brothers, a sister, a new stepmother Catherine Hughes and his
father, Rowland, a hatter.
Our next record of Nathaniel Eames (b.1715) came in 1743 when
he married Margaret Morris on February 2, at the parish of Beddgelert,
Caernavonshire, Wales. Beddgelert was a small parish maybe 5 or
10 miles from Llanllyfni. We are not certain what brought Nathaniel
to this perish to live. He apparently spent the remainder of his
life there. Our Welsh researcher Bob Owen had some biographies of
Nathaniel's son Rowland (b.1756), which said that his father was
a lead miner. It may be then, that Nathaniel (b.1715) moved into
this area to be nearer the mines, which he worked in. One record
from Mr. Owen's private collection gives the name of a Nathaniel
Eamys with 5 others who in October of 1769, had mined over 86 tons
of copper at Drwsfcoed mine. This may vary well be a reference to
our Nathaniel Eames (b. 1715), the miner but we cannot ha sure.
It would be interesting to know the exact location of this Drolsfcoed
mine. There were several different mines in the area and many of
Nathaniel's descendants and kinsmen worked in them, mostly at the
slate mines in Caernarvonshire. The miners usually moved around
from mine to mine over the years. Nathaniel probably worked in a
good number of them, which could have taken him away from home for
periods of time.
One might ask the question, how can we be certain that this Nathaniel
Eames the miner who lived and died at Beddgelert and who is easily
traceable from there by well documented evidence is our ancestor,
how can we know that he is the same Nathaniel born in 1715 at Llanllyfni?
His marriage record in 1743 apparently did not indicate that he
was from Llanllyfni, not did his death record include. The evidence
is quite strong that Nathaniel Eames, is also Nathaniel Eames (b.1715)
at Llanllyfni. We have no other Nathaniel at that early period whose
records could really be confused with our Nathaniel Eames. It should
be remembered that when Bob Omen connected these families together,
he did not just pull out our direct ancestors, but his pedigree
chart included vital statistics and connecting links for all of
the Eames families and all of the marriages into the families and
their descendants as far as he could carry them. When we, put the
complete puzzle together you are more certain of the pieces than
when you just look at a small part of it. Mr. Owen also knew living
descendants of these people who would have helped him with their
knowledge of the family. Further evidence is had in the fact that
Nathaniel Eames' younger brother John, followed him to Baddgelert,
was married there and died there too. Our most conclusive evidence
is the will of Hugh Eames in 1797, brother to Nathaniel and John.
In the will, Hugh leaves money to his brother John Eames Griffith,
the son of his brother John Eames and to Rowland Eames, son of his
late brother Nathaniel Eames. Now what are the chances of there
being in that small area more than me Nathaniel Eames who had brothers
John and Hugh, a son Rowland and a nephew Griffith, son of John,
and who passed away before 1797, but whose brothers, son and nephew
were all still living in 1797? This example illustrates that, generally
speaking, where there's a will there's a way to connect families
together.
As previously stated Margaret Morris was the wife of Nathaniel
Eames (b.1715). The Bishop's Transcripts for Beddgelert show that
marriage entry as: Nathaniel Eames and Margaret his wife married
2 Feb 1743. Nathaniel may have been 28 years old at that time. We
do not know how old Margaret Morris was. No record of her birth
has bean found. The fact that the marriage took place in Beddgelert
and that they lived there afterwards might indicate that Margaret
was from that perish. It is not certain haw much effort has gone
into searching for a birth record for Margaret Morris and to find
her ancestry.
Thirteen years after the marriage of Nathaniel Eames (b.1715)
to Margaret Morris, their only known child, Rowland Eames, was born
at Beddgelert. The baptismal entry is partially illegible in the
Bishop's Transcripts. It says: Rowland son of Nathaniel Eams laborer
and Margaret his wife ______ 1756. The unclear part is the day and
month of baptism. Jane Musgrove feels that the month is August,
while Bob Owen simply says late in the year.
Was there really only one child born to this couple? Could they
have lived somewhere else for 13 years after their marriage and
had additional children, and then returned to Beddgelert before
Rowland was born? Could other children have come later? The parish
registers at Beddgelert were apparently not too well kept, so could
vital entries have been missed altogether? It would be difficult
to completely satisfy ourselves with answers to all these questions,
but evidence is pretty good that this was a small family, and probably
only one son lived to maturity. Rowland (b.1756) had the rare privilege
of obtaining a formal education, pursuing and perfecting his music
skills. His family was clearly not among the upper class, yet they
had the money for Rowland's training, something they probably could
not have done had there been a larger family. Rowland became rather
famous, perhaps the most prominent of all the 18th and 19th century
Eames family. Bob Owen had access to a large amount of information,
concerning him. It seems doubtful that among his biographical information
in several books, no mention mould be made of brothers and sisters,
were there any who lived to maturity, in the will of his uncle,
Hugh Eames, Rowland is remembered, but no brothers or sisters are
mentioned. Hugh certainly did not name all of his nephews and nieces
but had there been a brother older than Rowland, it is likely that
he would have been remembered.
Because of the age about which we are writing, if there had been
another child born to Nathaniel (b.1715) and Margaret, it would
most likely have been a girl. A girl could more easily have gone
unmentioned than a boy. For this reason a particular entry found
in the Bishop's Transcripts for Baddgelert deserves mention here.
Jane Musgrove found a marriage entry as follows: Rice Williams of
Llanegrin, single to Jane Eames of Beddgelert, spinster 4 June 1781.
The witnesses were: Rowland Eames and Richard Evans. The Rowland
Eames who signed as a witness would most certainly be our Rowland
(b.1756), but who was the bride, Jane Eames of Beddgelert? Rowland
had a cousin Jane Eames living at Beddgelart at the time but in
1781, she mould have been 9 years old. Could this Jane Eames be
a sister of Rowland Eames (b.l756)? Further research on this will
be needed to answer that question.
A final entry of historical interest for Nathaniel Eames (b.1715)
and Margaret Morris is their burial entry at Beddgelart. It states:
buried 29 Oct 1788 Nathaniel Emes of Bryncoch, labr. and of Margaret
Morris his wife, the same day. This causes one to wonder how they
met their death to have died at so nearly the same time. Nathaniel
would have been 73 years old when he died. Being that old and living
in the 18th century, it would be much more likely than it would
be today for them to have died from the same illness at that same
time.
Less than 9 months after their death, a grandson was born who
was named after this grandfather Nathaniel. Then 60 years later,
that grandson and his wife Sarah Jones would die within 3 days of
each other as they gave up their lives in the attempt to plant their
family in a new land, all for a strange new religion they had joined
known as Mormonism.
return
to top |